Decisions of the Information Commissioner

The Investigator annulled the MMUH's decision and directed it to conduct a fresh decision making process on the request.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Defence Forces.

The Investigator varied the HSE's decision. She affirmed its effective decision to refuse, under section 15(1)(a) of the FOI Act, the request for records relating to specific communications other than those already released. She annulled its decision to refuse, under section 15(1)(a) of the FOI Act, the request for records relating to the outsourcing of occupational health services in named areas. She directed it to carry out searches and a fresh decision-making process in respect of this aspect of the request.

The Investigator affirmed Tusla's decision.

The Investigator annulled the Department's decision.

The Investigator varied the decision of the Defence Forces

The Investigator affirmed the decision of the Hospital to refuse the applicant's request.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Commission to refuse access, under sections 37(1) and 41(1)(a) of the Act, to the information at issue.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Department.

The Investigator varied the CRA's decision. She found that section 36(1)(b) applied to certain records and parts of records and that public interest did not weigh in favour of their release. She found that the remaining information was not exempt and directed its release.