Decisions of the Information Commissioner

The Investigator varied the Department's decision. She found that the Department was justified, under sections 29(1) and 36(1), in refusing access to most of the records within the scope of the review. However, she found that it was not justified in refusing access to three of the records and directed their release.

The Senior Investigator annulled the decision of the RSA on the ground that certain relevant records do, indeed, exist. He directed the RSA to process the request afresh.

The Senior Investigator annulled the decision of the TII and directed the release of the record at issue.

The Investigator varied the decision of the Defence Forces

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Department.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the HSE.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of AGS to refuse access to the records sought, pursuant to schedule 1, part 1(n) of the Act.

The Investigator affirmed the Council's decision. She found that the Council was justified in refusing access to the withheld information on the basis that it is exempt from release under section 37(1) of the FOI Act.

The Senior Investigator annulled the Board's decision and he directed it to conduct a fresh decision making process on the request.

The Investigator annulled Tusla's decision